![]() Not on a local network? No problem either. In any case, now that you have "virtualized" the printer share with an acceptable device name, set it up to be used in RD. Then do a NET USE LPT1: \\mycomputer\\hplaserDOT4.II Or use the feature in the Printer and Fax Wizard to define a custom local port mapping. The "port" would be whatever comuter actualy hosts the printer: e.g. Then define it as a network shared device, using a unique name. ![]() Use the DOT4 for any local specification. ![]() The second traditional workaround is to double the device. This lets you print (but not scan or fax). Use a unique name for the device for each instance. What I have done in the past, and admittedly it has been a while, is use the notion that I can define the same printer several times.įor example, I can define a second instance of that same printer as a USB or parallel device and use that for the redirection. By default, multifunction print devices may not be redirected unless you are running Windows Server 2003 on your local computer because they use DOT4 ports." By default, printer port names that do not begin with COM, LPT, or USB are only redirected in Windows Server 2003. As the MS KB you used to make a registry edit for XP notes: "This problem occurs because the printer port does not begin with COM, LPT, or USB. The Canon still prints to USB as well so I haven't lost that.Airwolf has the right notion as to where to start with matters. I do have two USB printers connected now though, an Epson colour laser and a Canon Inkjet so that may have been a factor. It is odd that I have never seen the Dot option before, I have been installing printers for years and it was always a simple five minute job. Talk about a marathon effort to install a printer that was already installed I don't know if it will survive a reboot, which was my downfall on previous occasions, but at least it is printing from LPT1 and showing all the right details. I closed that and the computer immediately dived into a "new hardware found" routine and promptly installed another copy of the drivers on dot4 which wouldn't print either, so I went to device manager and deleted the Dot4 references, went back to the control panel and selected the printer on LPT1 and at last it printed. The reboot after installation also brought up an HP utility Window I've never seen before with coloured buttons and other Jazz, but that did nothing useful. That then let me choose LPT1 as the printer port but it still wouldn't print. It wouldn't offer anything but Dot4-001 as the install port, then I hit on the idea of trying the option to install another printer. That answered my question but I still had a helluva job to get it up and running. How can I force this printer back onto LPT-1? At one stage Old Faithful had three LPT ports running with a variety of printers plus the scanner and never complained once! This is unfamiliar territory to me, I've been installing and uninstalling printers for years and never saw anything like this. ![]() It prints test pages OK (most of the time, sometimes it fails) but when I try to print a document I get an error message "cannot find DOT4-001" etc. More often than not I now get an error message "can't print to Port DOT4-001" and on checking in Device Manager I find that it is not installed on LPT-1 but is on what seems to be a virtual port called DOT4-001. I loaded the CD and installed the drivers, printed a test page and thought all was well, but no such luck. I hooked my HP1200 printer up to LPT1 on my main computer via the in/out pass-through ports on my HP scanner, booted the computer and the printer was duly recognised. Since Old Faithful (my decrepit W98 Print Server) died, with the printing demands of two UNI students plus my business to satisfy I have had to make other arrangements for the print-load here on our home network. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |